Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 26-12-24 20:34 CET |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | |
0002190 | SphereServer | new feature request | public | 13-08-13 17:30 | 30-04-14 11:45 | |
Reporter | XuN | |||||
Assigned To | XuN | |||||
Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A | |
Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | |||
Platform | OS | OS Version | ||||
Product Version | 16-06-2013, 0.56b Prerelease | |||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | 0.56c Nightly | ||||
Summary | 0002190: Attacker. functionality | |||||
Description | It would be nice if we have more control about attacker system, like making actual methods also writable instead of read only and adding a way to add/remove chars by script, if I want to remove just one player from the attacker list I just can't do it like either add them. | |||||
Tags | No tags attached. | |||||
Nightly Version | Automated (specify build number) | |||||
Experimental Flags | None | |||||
Option Flags | None | |||||
Internal Build Number | 1599 | |||||
Attached Files | ||||||
Notes | |
(0002045) Avatar (reporter) 14-04-14 11:34 edited on: 14-04-14 12:48 |
Why dont you prevent attacking one from attacker list ? For instance , for n 0 <eval <attacker> -1 > then list all attackers if you want with serv.list.attackers.add <attacker.<dlocal.n>.uid> then it becomes writable :) So how can you prevent , put return 1 under on=@gethit to corresponding attacker. or referance the attacker then stop his action. |
(0002049) XuN (developer) 14-04-14 17:25 |
Huh, old one request :P. I took a look some time ago and was unable to do it, will have another look asap. However, if you want to know ... the issue is not how to solve this ... I made exactly another system for attackers... but the default one should be flexible enough to do that simple things so no one needs to have 2 systems working (default and custom one). |
(0002052) Avatar (reporter) 15-04-14 08:07 |
You are right. If it is okay with default one, no need to function it customly. It wont be efficient. So lets assign this to you then :D |
(0002134) XuN (developer) 30-04-14 11:45 |
Added it: -Added attacker.add uid / attacker.delete uid. Self explanatory -Changed: attacker.elapsed/dam are now writable |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
13-08-13 17:30 | XuN | New Issue | |
14-04-14 11:34 | Avatar | Note Added: 0002045 | |
14-04-14 11:35 | Avatar | Note Edited: 0002045 | View Revisions |
14-04-14 11:36 | Avatar | Note Edited: 0002045 | View Revisions |
14-04-14 12:48 | Avatar | Note Edited: 0002045 | View Revisions |
14-04-14 17:25 | XuN | Note Added: 0002049 | |
15-04-14 08:07 | Avatar | Note Added: 0002052 | |
15-04-14 08:08 | Avatar | Assigned To | => XuN |
15-04-14 08:08 | Avatar | Status | new => assigned |
30-04-14 11:45 | XuN | Note Added: 0002134 | |
30-04-14 11:45 | XuN | Status | assigned => resolved |
30-04-14 11:45 | XuN | Fixed in Version | => 0.56c Nightly |
30-04-14 11:45 | XuN | Resolution | open => fixed |
Copyright © 2000 - 2010 MantisBT Group |