| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 10-06-26 12:11 CEST |  |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | |
| 0002037 | SphereServer | new feature request | public | 11-09-11 01:37 | 14-12-13 19:44 | |
| Reporter | babidi | |||||
| Assigned To | khaos | |||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | N/A | |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | |||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | ||||
| Product Version | 20-09-2009, 0.56b Prerelease | |||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | |||||
| Summary | 0002037: a server function like allclients -> allplayers | |||||
| Description | i think could be good to had the possibility to: add serv.allplayers that works like allclients but even on people disconnected. i know exists forplayers but is limited to be done by a character in game, and limited to only first map. so if you want allplayers, even on other maps, you have to travel map 1-5 and do a forplayers on every map, then put together the results. ofcourse if a player goes from map 0 to map 5 while you are doing the work, it will be counted 2 times... | |||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | |||||
| Nightly Version | Not Available | |||||
| Experimental Flags | None | |||||
| Option Flags | None | |||||
| Internal Build Number | ||||||
| Attached Files | ||||||
 Relationships |
|
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
|
(0001817) khaos (developer) 14-12-13 17:42 |
FORPLAYERS, FORCLIENTS, and FORCHARS could be used for this. |
|
(0001818) babidi (reporter) 14-12-13 17:44 |
not realy. for* are useful only on the map of the player is used of. |
|
(0001822) khaos (developer) 14-12-13 19:25 edited on: 14-12-13 19:26 |
FOR can be run per map, then check for FORPLAYERS/FORCLIENTS within that FOR. FORPLAYERS already works on disconnected and connected players. FOR can be used for MAP access. |
|
(0001826) khaos (developer) 14-12-13 19:44 |
Script option was given above. I don't see a reason to add more to the internal resources if this can be done via a script. Possible addition maybe, it is noted; but again... it is more than doable as it is. I don't see a reason to add it at this given time. |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 11-09-11 01:37 | babidi | New Issue | |
| 14-12-13 17:42 | khaos | Note Added: 0001817 | |
| 14-12-13 17:42 | khaos | Status | new => closed |
| 14-12-13 17:42 | khaos | Assigned To | => khaos |
| 14-12-13 17:42 | khaos | Resolution | open => no change required |
| 14-12-13 17:44 | babidi | Note Added: 0001818 | |
| 14-12-13 17:44 | babidi | Status | closed => feedback |
| 14-12-13 17:44 | babidi | Resolution | no change required => reopened |
| 14-12-13 19:25 | khaos | Note Added: 0001822 | |
| 14-12-13 19:26 | khaos | Note Edited: 0001822 | View Revisions |
| 14-12-13 19:44 | khaos | Note Added: 0001826 | |
| 14-12-13 19:44 | khaos | Status | feedback => closed |
| 14-12-13 19:44 | khaos | Resolution | reopened => fixed |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2010 MantisBT Group |
 |