0002252: Inheritance for items/chars - SphereServer BugTracker

View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ]

[ Issue History ] [ Print ]

Project

Category

View Status

Date Submitted

Last Update

0002252

SphereServer

new feature request

public

24-12-13 00:02

24-12-13 20:47

Reporter

Bubonic Pestilence

Assigned To

Ben

Priority

normal

Severity

feature

Reproducibility

always

Status

closed

Resolution

no change required

Platform

OS Version

Product Version

16-06-2013, 0.56b Prerelease

Target Version

Fixed in Version

Summary

0002252: Inheritance for items/chars

Description

Hello Devs.

Current Situation:
[chardef t1]
id c_troll

on=@create
  color 36

[chardef t2]
id t1

on=@create
  color 48

If you do .add t1, it will be shown as troll and it will inherit troll's properties.
But if you do .add t2, it will show error in console and c_man will be added.

What i'm asking for, is... it's already XXI century, century of OOP, give us ability to inherit properties, triggers, events & etc.

something like:

[chardef c_llama_newbie]
id c_llama
name Newbie Llama, Uncolored

on=@death
  src.consume 10000 i_gold

[chardef c_llama_newbie_colored]
id c_llama_newbie
name Colored Newbie Llama

on=@death
  super // triggers parent's @death trigger
  src.consume 5000 i_gold // additional 5k, total 15k for using colored

[chardef c_llama_newbie_colored_mana]
id c_llama_newbie_colored
name Colored Newbie Llama with Mana Reg

on=@mount
  src.events +mana_reg

Don't you think it "slightly" shorter than copying all triggers/props from "parent" llamas? )

Tags

No tags attached.

Nightly Version

Not Available

Experimental Flags

None

Option Flags

None

Internal Build Number

Attached Files

Relationships

Notes
(0001866) Ben (manager) 24-12-13 14:00	right... cuz copy/paste is such a hard task... what if you don't want a certain property to be inherited? then your stuck setting those to something else. I really don't see a need for this.

(0001867) Bubonic Pestilence (reporter) 24-12-13 16:34 edited on: 24-12-13 16:40	It's all about how detailed your subclasses. like: c_man > c_elf > c_elf_on_horse > c_elf_on_horse_with_mace but if you want elf without horse, you can do this: c_man > c_elf > c_elf_with_sword And... IMHO... if you're prefering c&p... i think you're not good person to discuss developing patterns...

(0001868) Ben (manager) 24-12-13 20:47	Really? You think that was wise?

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
24-12-13 00:02	Bubonic Pestilence	New Issue
24-12-13 14:00	Ben	Note Added: 0001866
24-12-13 16:34	Bubonic Pestilence	Note Added: 0001867
24-12-13 16:40	Bubonic Pestilence	Note Edited: 0001867	View Revisions
24-12-13 20:47	Ben	Note Added: 0001868
24-12-13 20:47	Ben	Status	new => closed
24-12-13 20:47	Ben	Assigned To	=> Ben
24-12-13 20:47	Ben	Resolution	open => no change required